Increasingly, technologies and algorithms are being used to streamline asylum procedures. These range from biometric matching engines that examine iris scans and fingerprints to directories for refugees and asylum seekers to chatbots to help people signup protection circumstances. These tools are designed to make it easier with respect to states and agencies to process asylum applications, especially as much systems are slowed down as a result of COVID-19 outbreak and increasing levels of forced displacement.
Nevertheless they raise a number of human rights concerns. Such as privacy problems, opaque decision-making, and her latest blog the potential for biases or machine errors that may lead to discriminatory outcomes. Additionally, they pose significant troubles to migrant workers and refugees, who are often already voiceless and inclined.
Ozkul’s explore explores many ways in which fresh technologies can be used to verify identities and narratives of migrants, allowing them to improve their asylum application procedure. It also looks at the ways in which these technology can create a specific informational space around migrant workers, and how that they configure their very own subjecthood. Subsequent Foucault, your lady argues that such methods are both territorial and institutional. For example , iris scanning methods can be seen seeing that an institutional technology, as they require the migrant to enter a specific territory in order to be recognized; while suggestion algorithms are commercial and global in their effects, configuring subject areas as consumers.
As a result, they enact a particular form of hegemonic power above displaced people. This is especially true given the current contest to the bottom in asylum policy : with some countries offering incentives like the Nansen passport to help cachette resettling and others awe-inspiring restrictive coverages that block their particular access to place and push them back to dangerous and deadly journeys.
